RESEARCH LIBRARY

Academic Medicine: Volume 97 - Issue 4 - Pages 476-477

Response to to emphasize that although findings support a relationship between multiple USMLE attempts and increased likelihood of receiving disciplinary actions, the findings in isolation are not sufficient for proposing new policy on how many attempts should be allowed.

Journal of Educational Measurement: Volume 58, Issue 4, Pages 515-537

In this paper, the NBME team reports the results an eye-tracking study designed to evaluate how the presence of the options in multiple-choice questions impacts the way medical students responded to questions designed to evaluate clinical reasoning. Examples of the types of data that can be extracted are presented. We then discuss the implications of these results for evaluating the validity of inferences made based on the type of items used in this study.

Academic Medicine: Volume 96 - Issue 9 - Pages 1319-1323

This study examined the relationship between USMLE attempts and the likelihood of receiving disciplinary actions from state medical boards.

Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 39: 37-44

This article presents the results of an experiment in which content experts were randomly assigned to one of two response probability conditions: .67 and .80. If the standard-setting judgments collected with the bookmark procedure are internally consistent, both conditions should produce highly similar cut scores.

The authors examined the extent to which USMLE scores relate to the odds of receiving a disciplinary action from a U.S. state medical board.